Wounds International, Vol 1; Issue 3Made EasysPromogran and Promogran Prisma made easy

Promogran and Promogran Prisma made easy

25/05/10 | Complex wounds, Infection | Cullen B, Ivins N

Promogran and Promogran Prisma made easyThis article describes in detail the composition, mode of action, evidence base and the practical application of a generation of advanced topical treatments containing collagen and oxidised regenerated cellulose, which are designed to convert the non-healing chronic wound environment to a healing state. It is important that clinicians know how and when to use these advanced treatments in order to deliver efficient and effective wound management.



Promogran protease modulating matrix is an advanced topical treatment for chronic wounds that has the potential to alter the wound environment in a positive way to promote healing. This can help to improve outcomes for patients with static or hard-to-heal wounds [1-3].

Promogran is an absorbent open-pored, sterile, freeze-dried matrix that is composed of 55% collagen and 45% oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC). These are both natural materials that are readily broken down or reabsorbed when placed in the wound.

When the collagen/ORC matrix comes into contact with fluid/exudate in the wound, it absorbs the liquid to form a soft gel. This allows the dressing to conform to the shape of the wound and come into contact with all areas of the wound. The gel physically binds to and inactivates damaging proteases, both matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and elastase that are present within the wound. In addition, it binds with naturally occurring growth factors and prevents them from being broken down by damaging proteases. As the matrix slowly breaks down, the growth factors are released back into the wound in an active form, while the damaging proteases remain inactive [4].


Promogran Prisma wound balancing matrix is a version of Promogran that includes silver. This provides protection against bacteria, while allowing healing to progress. Although the theory of combining these materials is very simple, in practice achieving the optimal concentration of silver to avoid adverse affects on cell growth was quite complicated. From laboratory investigations it was found that the that the optimum formulation or combination involved preparing a silver-ORC compound at a 1% concentration.

In addition, Promogran Prisma has an increased amount of collagen and ORC in the dressing compared to Promogran. This increases the overall density of the product and extends the time taken for collagen and ORC to biodegrade in the wound. This is important since when there is an increased bioburden, exudate levels are also elevated.


Both products are formed by preparing medical-grade collagen and fibres of oxidised regenerated cellulose in a liquid suspension. In the case of Promogran Prisma, silver-ORC fibres are added at this stage. The suspension is then frozen and placed under a vacuum. In this frozen form the water in the formulation exists as ice crystals, which sublimes (turns directly from a solid to a gas) under the high vacuum, and is gradually removed from the frozen material. When all of the water has been removed, the remaining collagen/ORC is left as a 3D structure. This dehydration process (known as lyophilisation or freeze-drying) allows for the structural properties of these natural materials to be preserved and is widely used in the pharmaceutical industry to prepare highly stable drug formulations.

The products are manufactured as a 3mm-thick sheet, which is cut into hexagonal pieces. Wounds are generally more circular in shape, but producing a circular-shaped dressing leads to a high level of waste material in the production process. The product was therefore shaped as hexagonal pieces; this provides a repeating pattern, minimising waste and each piece closely resembling a circular shape.



Collagen derives its name from 'kolla', the Greek word meaning glue. Although collagen was known to the Romans as early as AD50, its structure was not clearly defined until 1955 [5], and it was not until the 1970s that collagen was discovered to be a family of proteins with at least 28 members [6].

Today, collagen is recognised as a major structural protein that is present in all animals and is used to support and connect bodily tissues and internal organs. It is one of the most abundant proteins in the human body, making up 25% of the total protein and is a major constituent of skin, bone, tendons, muscles and cartilage [7]. It is an extremely important protein and has a number of unique physical and biological properties that are essential for function. Collagen has a high tensile strength and has an important role in tissue repair (Box 1). It has been used extensively in a wide range of medical fields, including wound healing, haemostasis, sutures, artificial heart valves and arteries, hernia repair, and soft tissue augmentation. Collagen type 1 is most commonly used and can be isolated from skin (animal hide) or tendon.

Promogran Box 1

Box 1 (click image to enlarge)



Cellulose is a natural biomaterial found in most vegetation and constitutes about one third of all plant matter, making it the most abundant biomaterial on earth. In its natural form it cannot be digested or degraded by humans and consequently has limited application. However, once it is chemically modified through oxidation the material is readily degraded and absorbed by the body [14]. The regenerative process produces fibres of uniform diameter that oxidise in a reproducible manner, creating a material that has consistent physical and chemical characteristics. ORC has been used clinically for over 50 years and is more commonly recognised as the biomaterial used in haemostatic agents [15].

Chemically, cellulose and ORC are both classified as polysaccharides, sugar molecules linked together to form a polymer; in the case of ORC, the main components are glucose and glucuronic acid. When ORC fibres absorb fluid such as saline solution or wound exudate, they swell and become a gel and break into their basic components (sugars), which can be completely absorbed [16,17].

As the ORC degrades, the glucuronic acid is released, which has the effect of lowering pH; a low pH is thought to help control bacterial growth by inhibiting it [18]. In addition to its haemostatic and bactericidal properties, in vitro studies have shown that ORC stimulates cell migration and growth [19,20]. Studies have also shown its ability to reduce protease levels, specifically human neutrophil elastase and MMPs; scavenge free radicals; and bind excess metal ions [20,21].


Chronic wounds have been shown to contain elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, free radicals and proteases,Promogran Figure 1 creating a hostile wound environment that is detrimental to healing [22-24]. This perpetuates wound chronicity as it causes further tissue damage and degradation of key functional molecules. These include growth factors, which are required to stimulate cell growth and the production of new tissue [25,26]. The presence of bacteria exacerbates the problem and amplifies an already hostile environment, increasing the inflammatory response with increased levels of bacterial proteases [27,28] (Fig 1).

It is important to correct this underlying biochemistry to initiate healing. Promogran and Promogran Prisma can be used to modify the wound environment. These products may reduce the harmful factors such as proteases, free radicals and excess metal ions, while simultaneously protecting the positive factors such as matrix proteins and growth factors, leading to an overall increase in new tissue formation and progression towards healing (Box 2) [19,20,29-31].

Promogran Box 2

Box 2 (click image to enlarge)

Effect on proteases
Many studies have shown that both MMPs and serine proteases are elevated in chronic wounds. In particular, MMP-8 and 9 and human neutrophil elastase, all of which are inflammatory-derived proteases, have been shown to be the most predominant proteases in the chronic wound environment [29,32,33]. Published studies have shown that collagen/ORC reduces both MMP and serine protease activities, and is particularly effective against MMP-8, MMP-9 and elastase [29]. Furthermore, the combination of collagen and ORC is more effective at reducing protease levels than either component alone [34]. This reduction in protease activity is rapid and sustained, even when the material breaks down.

In vitro and clinical studies [29,31-35] have shown that the level of inflammatory cytokines and proteases are reduced in the presence of collagen/ORC. Its ability to scavenge free radicals, an end-product of inflammation, and to bind endotoxins and excess metal ions such as iron and zinc, which can induce further inflammation, provides indirect support for its favourable effect on the inflammatory process [20].

Effect on bioburden
Collagen/ORC may help to control bacterial levels through its ability to lower pH, an effect attributable to the ORC component [36]. The addition of silver-ORC to the formulation has been shown to be non-cytotoxic and may help to reduce the number of pathogens in the wound, irrespective of bacterial bioburden [37].



Collagen/ORC dressings have been evaluated in several randomised controlled clinical trials to measure their performance in diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers and venous leg ulcers [2,3,38-41]. In addition to the published trials, there are many case studies describing the beneficial effects of these dressings on a wide range of wounds [42-45]. See Table 1 below for a summary of published evidence for Promogran, and page 4 for a Promogran Prisma Case Study.

While these studies demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of Promogran and Promogran Prisma, they do not address the interactive nature of these matrices. However, several investigators have performed clinical research studies to examine the mechanism by which collagen/ORC can modify the wound environment [30,31,35].

For example, Lobmann et al treated 33 patients with Promogran versus a control dressing for eight days and removed tissue biopsies at three separate time points to measure protease levels [31]. They concluded that the wounds treated with Promogran had shown a greater reduction in wound size compared to the control dressing (16% vs 1.65%). Biochemically, Lobmann et al found that Promogran-treated wounds showed a reduction in the MMP9:MMP2 ratio. Further analysis demonstrated that this reduction in protease levels was not due to an alteration in the production of MMPs but was more likely to be due to the binding of the MMPs to the matrix.

One study has shown that wound fluid levels of MMPs and neutrophil elastase were reduced in wounds treated with collagen/ORC dressings and that these wounds subsequently healed within six to 12 weeks [35]. This result was confirmed in a larger study by Smeets et al, who reported a significant reduction of several key proteases, including gelatinases, elastase and plasmin, when wounds were treated with Promogran compared to a control dressing. This biochemical effect was associated with a reduction in wound size [30].

A number of RCTs on Promogran Prisma are ongoing and indicate improved wound healing compared to controls while providing protection from infection [36,46,47]. Further definitive studies are needed to confirm these initial findings.

Promogran  Table 1

Table 1 (click image to enlarge)


These dressings can be considered for use on wounds that have failed to proceed through an orderly and timely reparative process towards healing [48]. Lazarus et al defined this as any wound that shows little or no progression over an eight-week period [48]. Mustoe et al defines a chronic wound as one that is present for longer than 12 weeks and has failed to reach closure [49].


Promogran can be used for the treatment of exuding wounds including venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers. In practical terms, if a patient presents with a wound that has shown little change in the appearance of the wound bed or edges, and the size has remained the same, Promogran should be considered. The aim of the treatment is to 'kick start' healing where the wound appears to have got 'stuck'.


Promogran Prisma can be used on wounds that show signs of local infection or where a low-grade infection is suspected (see case study below). It may be appropriate to use Promogran Prisma if there has been a history of recurrent local infection, when the dressing can be used prophylactically as a preventative measure.  



Mr W is an 81-year-old man with type 2 diabetes and a recurrent venous leg ulcer of 11 months' duration. His main problem has been the failure of the ulcer to progress for approximately six months. Mr W had a previous ulcer in 2002, which achieved complete healing.

Mr W presented with an inactive ulcer to his right lateral malleolus. The ulcer measured 3.5cm² with an approximate depth of 0.3cm, and no apparent undermining. The surrounding skin was macerated, erythematous and excoriated with eczema and atrophe blanche. Exudate levels were moderate and there was a slight odour present. This may have been indicative of the presence of bacteria, which if left untreated, may have caused a local or systemic infection.

Mr W had previously been treated with a sodium carboxymethylcellulose primary wound dressing (Aquacel™) and had also treated the wound himself with Manuka honey. He was complaining of mild, intermittent pain.

The wound was dressed with Promogran Prisma. As a result of presenting symptoms it was felt the use of the silver in the dressing may prevent the development of any local infection. The dressing was prescribed for use twice weekly in combination with modified compression therapy. Mr W had been unable to tolerate high compression bandaging in the past. A thin knitted viscose secondary dressing (NA-Ultra™) was used with gauze padding. A steroid cream (Eumovate) and white soft paraffin were applied to protect the surrounding skin. Tracings and photographs were taken every 1-2 weeks.

Non healing ulcer on right malleolus prior to treatment with Promogran Prisma

Non healing ulcer on right malleolus prior to treatment with Promogran Prisma


Two weeks after commencing treatment, the wound bed appeared healthier, with granulation tissue visible at the base. The wound measured 2.5cm² in area and depth had decreased to 0.2cm. Two weeks later, the wound appeared to be 100% granulating, with no depth and an area of 1cm².

On the last recorded assessment, the wound was unchanged in area, but had a slight depth again of 0.2cm. The wound remained healthy in appearance. Mr W had also reduced the amount of compression during this time, which may have affected healing.

Over the course of six weeks, Mr W has made good progress towards healing with the use of Promogran Prisma combined with compression therapy. He finds the dressing comfortable when in situ and has requested to continue using the dressing. Mr W's ulcer healed within four weeks of the final evaluation.

Appearance after three weeks of treatment with Promogran Prisma

Appearance after three weeks of treatment with Promogran Prisma



Step 1: Prepare the wound bed
Before any application of Promogran or Promogran Prisma, the wound bed should be prepared according to local policy. This will usually involve removal of necrotic or sloughy tissue and any previous dressings.
Note: if there are signs and symptoms of an infection, this should be treated appropriately and the use of Promogran Prisma considered.

Step 2: Assess the level of exudate
The products are supplied pre-packed and packaged in a tray. This can be used to hold saline to pre-wet the dressing if the wound has a low exudate level. Alternatively, a small amount of saline can be added to the surface of the dressing once it has been applied to the wound bed. This helps to initiate the breakdown of the dressing and its ability to modify the wound environment.
Note: the choice of the secondary dressing is dependent on the level of exudate.

Step 3: Apply the dressing
Place the dressing in the wound bed. If the patient has multiple small wounds the dressing can be broken into smaller pieces with a gloved hand.
Note: if there is any depth to the wound the dressing should be layered to fill the wound.

Step 4: Dressing review
Based on instructions of use, the dressing should be changed every 72 hours or more frequently if the exudate level is high. If the gel has not biodegraded the dressing should be left in place until the next dressing change, minimising disturbance to the wound. If there is no residue of gel in the wound bed or traces left on the secondary dressing and the wound bed is clean and granulating, the dressing has fully biodegraded. Both products can be used under compression bandaging and do not cause indentation, skin irritation or maceration, even when the dressing is overlapped at the wound edge.



From personal experience, during the first few dressing changes there should be a change in the colour of the wound bed and a reduction in the amount of sloughy tissue present. Following two weeks of treatment there should be a marked reduction in the level of exudate. Often the first change is that patients report a reduction in the level of pain experienced.


There is no need to stop Promogran or Promogran Prisma if the wound is progressing well. However, if the wound is epithelialising and there is no exudate, it may be more appropriate to change to a simple non-adherent dressing.


Neither product should be used on patients with full-thickness burn injuries, active vasculitis or a known hypersensitivity to either collagen or ORC [4]. If infection is present or suspected, it should be treated according to local policy. Promogran Prisma can be used with systemic antibiotics to treat infection.



A case for using these products can be made if they can be shown to accelerate healing and reduce the number of dressing changes. This may be supported by evidence from clinical trials [50,51]. In addition, it is important to consider factors such as reduction in pain because many patients may experience high levels of pain, which can affect all aspects of daily life and may cause poor sleeping patterns [52].

Furthermore, Phillips et al [53] have reported that many patients with leg ulcers experience negative financial, social and psychological effects, which are resolved once the ulcer is healed.

Often decisions about which dressing to use are based on limited clinical experience. Patients may see a number of practitioners and be prescribed different dressings by each. This may lead to a lack of continuity of care with poor rationale for treatment choice, which may negatively impact on costs. It is therefore important that clinicians understand when and how to use these products appropriately to ensure optimum outcomes for patients. 



Promogran and Promogran Prisma are designed to provide an optimum wound healing environment and to modify the wound biochemistry, by reducing excessive protease activity to promote healing. These dressings can be considered in a wide range of wounds to 'kick start' healing.



Cullen B, Scientific Programme Manager, Systagenix Wound Management, Skipton, UK

Ivins N, Research Nurse, Wound Healing Research Unit, Cardiff University, UK

Supported by an educational grant from Systagenix. The views expressed in this 'Made Easy' section do not necessarily reflect those of Systagenix.




  1. Gibson D, Cullen B, Legerstee R, et al. MMPs Made Easy. Wounds International 2009; 1(1): Available from http://www.woundsinternational.com/article.php?issueid=1&contentid=123&articleid=21
  2. Vin F, Teot L, Meaume S. The healing properties of PROMOGRAN in venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2002; 11(9): 335-41.
  3. Veves A, Sheenan P, Pham HT. A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg 2002; 137(7): 822-7.
  4. Promogran data card. Available at http://www.dressings.org/Dressings/promogran.html
  5. Subramanian E. GN Ramachandran (obituary). Nature Struct Biol 2001; 8(6): 489-91.
  6. Veit G, Kobbe B, Keene DR, et al. Collagen XXVIII, a novel von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein with many imperfections in the collagenous domain. J Biol Chem 2006; 281(6): 3494-504.
  7. Di Lullo GA, Sweeney SM, Körkkö J, et al. Mapping the ligand-binding sites and disease-associated mutations on the most abundant protein in the human, type I collagen. J Biol Chem 2002; 277(6): 4223-31.
  8. Shoshan S. Wound healing. In: Hall DA, Jackson DS, (eds). International Review of Connective Tissue Research. New York: Academic Press, 1981; 9: 1-25.
  9. Chvapil M, Kronenthal L, Van Wrinkle Jr WA. Medical and surgical applications of collagen. Int Rev Connective Tissue Res 1973; 6: 1-61.
  10. Pachence JM. Collagen-based devices for soft tissue repair. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 33(1): 35-40.
  11. Postlewaithe AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH. Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type I, II and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1978; 75(2): 871-5.
  12. Mian M, Beghe F, Mian E. Collagen as a pharmacological approach in wound healing. Int J Tissue React 1992; 14(Suppl): 1-9.
  13. Schultz GS, Ladwig G, Wysocki A. Extracellular matrix: a review of its roles in acute and chronic wounds. World Wide Wounds 2005; Available from:  http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2005/august/Schultz/Extrace-Matric-Acute-Chronic-Wounds.html  (accessed April 2010).
  14. Doelker E. Cellulose derivatives. Adv Polymer Sci 1993; 107: 199-265.
  15. Bajerová M, Krejčová K, Rabišková M, et al. Oxycellulose: Significant characteristics in relation to its pharmaceutical and medical applications. Adv Polymer Technol 2009; 28(3): 199-208.
  16. Stilwell RL, Mark MG, Saferstein L, Wiseman DM. Oxidised cellulose: chemistry, processing and medical applications. In: Domb AJ, Kost J, Wiseman DM (eds). Handbook of Biodegradable Polymers. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997; 291-306.
  17. Dimitrijevich SD, Tatarko M, Gracy RW, et al. In vivo degradation of oxidized, regenerated cellulose. Carbohydr Res 1990; 198(2): 331-41.
  18. Dineen P. Antibacterial activity of oxidized regenerated cellulose. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 142(4): 481-6.
  19. Hart J, Silcock D, Gunnigle S, et al. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair: effects in vitro on fibroblast biology and in vivo in a model of compromised healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002; 34(12): 1557-70.
  20. Cullen B, Watt PW, Lundqvist C, et al. The role of oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of action. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002; 34(12): 1544-56.
  21. Jeschke MG, Sandmann G, Schubert T, Klein D. Effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen matrix on dermal and epidermal healing and growth factors in an acute wound. Wound Repair Regen 2005; 13(3): 324-31.
  22. Harris IR, Yee KC, Walters CE, et al. Cytokine and protease levels in healing and non-healing chronic venous leg ulcers. Exper Dermatol 1995; 4(6): 342-9.
  23. Salim AS. The role of oxygen-derived free radicals in the management of venous (varicose) ulceration: a new approach. World J Surg 1991; 15(2): 264-9.
  24. Wysocki AB, Staiano-Coico L, Grinnell F. Wound fluid from chronic leg ulcers contains elevated levels of metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101(1): 64-8.
  25. Grinnell F, Zhu M. Fibronectin degradation in chronic wounds depends on relative levels of elastase, alpha1-proteinase inhibitor and alpha2-macroglobulin. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106(2): 335-41.
  26. Chen SM, Ward SI, Olutoye OO, et al. Ability of chronic wound fluids to degrade peptide growth factors is associated with increased levels of elastase activity and diminished levels of proteinase inhibitors. Wound Rep Regen 1997; 5(1): 23-32.
  27. Davies CE, Wilson MJ, Hill KE, et al. Use of molecular techniques to study microbial diversity in the skin: chronic wounds re-evaluated. Wound Rep Regen 2001; 9(5): 332-40.
  28. Schmidtchen A, Holst E, Tapper H, Björck L. Elastase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa degrade plasma proteins and extracellular products of human skin and fibroblasts, and inhibit fibroblast growth. Microb Pathog 2003; 34(1): 47-55.
  29. Cullen B, Smith R, McCulloch E, et al. Mechanism of action of PROMOGRAN, a protease modulating matrix, for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2002; 10(1): 16-25.
  30. Smeets R, Ulrich D, Unglaub F, et al. Effect of oxidized regenerated cellulose/collagen matrix on proteases in wound exudate of patients with chronic venous ulceration. Int Wound J 2008; 5: 195-203.
  31. Lobmann R, Zemlin C, Motzkau M, et al. Expression of metalloproteinases and growth factors in diabetic wounds treated with a protease absorbent dressing. J Diabetes Complications 2006; 20(5): 329-35.
  32. Nwomeh BC, Liang H-X, Cohen IK, Yager DR. MMP-8 is the predominate collagenase in healing wounds and non-healing ulcers. J Surg Res 1999; 81(2): 189-95.
  33. Rayment EA, Upton Z, Shooter GK. Increased matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity observed in chronic wound fluid is related to the clinical severity of the ulcer. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158(5): 951-61.
  34. Cullen B, Boyle C, Webb Y. Modulation of the chronic wound environment; an in vitro evaluation of advanced wound therapies. Presented at Symposium of Advanced Wound Care (SAWC) Tampa, FL, 2007.  
  35. Cullen B, Kemp L, Essler L, Wallenfang-Sohle K, Stadler R. Rebalancing wound biochemistry improves healing: a clinical study examining effect of PROMOGRAN. Wound Rep Regen 2004; 12(2): A4.
  36. Cullen B, Jenkins E, Gibson M, et al. The effect of collagen-based dressings on bacterial growth. Presented at Symposium of Advanced Wound Care (SAWC) Dallas, TX, 2009.
  37. Gregory SJ, Rennison TJ, Cullen BM. Effect of ORC/collagen matrix containing silver on bacterial and host cells. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2005; 32(3 Suppl): S27-S28.
  38. Nisi G, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, et al. Use of a protease-modulating matrix in the treatment of pressure sores. Chir Ital 2005; 57(4): 465-8.
  39. Lázaro-Martinez JL, Garcia-Morales E, Beneit-Montesinos JV, et al. [Randomized comparative trial of a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers]. Article in Spanish. Circ Esp 2007; 82(1): 27-31.
  40. Wollina U, Schmidt WD, Krönert C, et al. Some effects of a topical collagen-based matrix on the microcirculation and wound healing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: preliminary observations. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2005; 4(4): 214-24.
  41. Kakagia DD, Kazakos KJ, Xarchas KC, et al. Synergistic action of protease-modulating matrix and autologous growth factors in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. A prospective randomized trial. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21(6): 387-91.
  42. Tausche AK, Sebastian G. Wound conditioning of a deep tissue defect including exposed bone after tumour excision using PROMOGRAN matrix, a protease modulating dressing. Int Wound J 2005; 2(3): 253-7.
  43. Guarnera G, Restuccia A. PROMOGRAN and complex surgical lesions, a case report. J Wound Care 2004; 13(6): 237-9.
  44. Omugha N, Jones AM. The management of hard-to-heal necrobiosis with PROMOGRAN. Br J Nurs 2003; 12(15): S14-20.
  45. Romanelli M, Dini V, Romanelli P. Hydroxyurea-induced leg ulcers treated with a protease modulating matrix. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(10): 1310-3.
  46. Lanzara S, Tacconi G, Zamboni P. A pilot randomised trial to determine the effects of a new active dressing on wound healing of venous leg ulcers. European Wound Management Association; Lisbon 2008.
  47. Gottrup F, Karlsmark T, Bishoff-Mikkelsen M, et al. Comparative clinical study to determine the effects of collagen/ORC + silver on wound healing of diabetic foot ulcers. European Wound Management Association (EWMA), Geneva, Switzerland 2010.
  48. Lazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, et al. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Arch Dermatol 1994; 130(4): 489-93.
  49. Mustoe TA, O'Shaughnessy K, Kloeters O. Chronic wound pathogenesis and current treatment strategies: a unifying hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117(7 Suppl): 35S-41S.
  50. Ghatnekar O, Willis M, Persson U. Cost-effectiveness of treating deep diabetic foot ulcers with Promogran in four European countries. J Wound Care 2002: 11(2): 70-4.
  51. Snyder R, Richter D, Hill ME. Sequential therapies and advanced wound care products as a standard of care in the home care setting. Proceedings 9th Annual New Cardiovascular Horizons, New Orleans, 2008.
  52. Walshe C. Living with a venous leg ulcer: a descriptive study of patients' experiences. J Adv Nurs 1995; 22(6): 1092-100.
  53. Phillips T, Stanton B, Provan A, Lew R. A study of the impact of leg ulcers on quality of life: financial, social, and psychologic implications. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 31(1): 49-53.




1. United States: Experience treating leg wounds

David Armstrong, Professor of Surgery, Southern Arizona Limb and Salvage Alliance, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, USA

Our SALSA unit at the University of Arizona frequently encounters inflammatory leg wounds of mixed etiology. We have found that treating these patients with systemic doxycycline (100mg twice daily), orally, coupled with oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen dressings under compression can often dramatically reduce inflammation, leading to more predictable healing. We use the doxycycline not for its antimicrobial effects, but for its profound anti-inflammatory (anti-metalloprotease) effects.

2. Spain: Treating diabetic foot ulcers

Lázaro-Martínez JL, Professor and Head Diabetic Foot Unit, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain

In our experience, Promogran can be used in patients with DFUs and has been shown to reduce wound healing time (mean time to healing was 23.3+/-9.9 days in group treated with Promogran compared to 40.6+/-1.15 days for controls p<0.01). Best results were achieved in patients who had received surgical debridement prior to treatment with Promogran [1]. We are currently undertaking a study to demonstrate not only the clinical benefits but also the economic advantages of using Promogran. This will be helpful in persuading healthcare purchasers to invest in this new advanced wound care technology.

  1. Lazaro-Martinez JL, Garcia-Morales E, Beneit-Montesinos JV, et al. [Randomized comparative trial of a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers]. Cir Esp 2007; 82(1): 27-31.


3. UK: Bradford Wound Healing Unit experience

Kath Vowden, Nurse Consultant and Peter Vowden Professor of Wound Healing Research, Bradford, UK

Effective wound management requires access to a range of wound care products with the targeted use of specific dressings based on the clinical assessment of the wound status.

Evaluation of both Promogran and Prisma within our unit demonstrated that both products have an important role to play as advanced wound care products in the management of hard to heal venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot wounds and patients with wounds associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Both these products have been on our local formulary for a number of years and patients continue to benefit from their use. As advanced products, the multidisciplinary wound care team directs their use and as such we have been able to ensure cost-effective use of these products by:

  • careful patient selection
  • regular reviews of progress
  • integration of their use into an overall wound management plan.

Both products work most effectively on clean, non-infected wounds. If necrotic tissue or slough is present we first debride the wound; if significant bacterial load is present we prefer to first treat the wound with antimicrobial dressings. These dressings are well tolerated by the patients and some report a reduction in wound pain. Exudate levels also seem to fall, possibly as a result of reduced wound inflammation



Foreign language editions