Breast, chest and truncal lymphoedema occurrence following risk-reducing mastectomy: a review of the literature

Christa Torrisi, Elizabeth A Anderson, Jane M Armer, Kajol Patel, Rebecca Graves
19 October 2023
Background: Gene mutations such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM and CHEK2 increase lifetime breast cancer risk. Women with these mutations may elect to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy to lower that elevated risk. However, as a sequelae of mastectomy, secondary lymphoedema may occur at any point in life following breast removal. Current research focuses predominantly on lymphoedema development in the extremities, not other locations such as the breast, chest and trunk. Moreover, current research centres around lymphoedema development in the context of breast cancer, not risk reduction. Aim: To understand reported incidence of breast, chest, and/or truncal lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy in women lacking a breast cancer diagnosis in the mastectomised breasts. Methods: Searches were performed in CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, PapersFirst, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science in July 2021 and again in May 2023. No article age limit was placed. To ensure the literature was thoroughly evaluated, two searches were performed: (1) bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy; and (2) contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Inclusion criteria were the presence of breast, chest and/or truncal lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy and female-assigned gender at birth, with exclusion criteria of a breast cancer diagnosis in the mastectomised breast and the diagnosis of ipsilateral arm lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy. Results: Based on the search for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy studies, 253 records were screened. Following this, 234 records were screened from the search for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy studies. Of the 487 records retrieved, no studies met inclusion criteria for this literature review, demonstrating a gap in the literature surrounding the study of lymphoedema occurrence in the setting of risk-reducing mastectomy. Conclusion: Understanding occurrence and patient-reported outcomes related to secondary lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy can serve to support the development of screening, risk reduction and survivorship interventions to promote previvors’ and survivors’ psychosocial and physical health.

The presence of a BRCA gene mutation has been predicted to increase lifetime risk of breast cancer by 72% for BRCA 1 carriers and 69% for BRCA 2 carriers (Kuchenbaecker et al, 2017), a significant increase when compared to the projected 12% lifetime risk of a woman without this mutation (McCarthy et al, 2017). While the current number of BRCA-positive women is unknown, it is believed that only 5.5% of BRCA carriers in the US have been identified (Drohan et al, 2012). Other gene mutations, such as ATM, PALB2 and CHEK2, are also predicted to increase lifetime breast cancer risk (Collins and Isaacs, 2020; Woods et al, 2020). 

Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) is an option selected by women who seek to proactively manage their elevated risk of breast cancer due to the presence of a genetic mutation. This risk-reducing surgery aims to remove as much breast tissue as possible, effectively lowering lifetime breast cancer risk by 90% (Rebbeck et al, 2004). BRRM has steadily gained in popularity, in part due to increased rates of genetic testing (Liede et al, 2018; Guo et al, 2020). Insurance claims database surveys between 2003 and 2016 found the rate of BRCA-positive women undergoing BRRM increased 1.2–1.6% a month (Liede et al, 2018). 

However, BRRM is not without the potential for complications. Infection, wound development, bleeding, and the need for reoperation have been noted following this surgery (Zion et al, 2003; Hunt et al, 2007), as have issues with body image decline, fear of breast cancer occurrence, sexuality and interpersonal relationships (Hallowell et al, 2012; Gopie et al, 2013; Grogan and Mechan, 2017; Glassey et al, 2018a, 2018b; Bai et al, 2019). While lymphoedema development in the upper extremity, breast, chest, and trunk is recognised as a complication of breast cancer survivorship (Armer et al, 2020; Flores et al, 2020; Anbari et al, 2021), it has not been acknowledged in the literature following risk-reducing mastectomy, despite the act of breast removal creating the potential for lymphoedema development (Fu et al, 2009; Liu et al, 2021). 

The burden of lymphoedema

Lymphoedema results from a disequilibrium between the microvascular filtration rate of the capillaries and venules and that of the lymphatic drainage system (Mortimer, 1998). Breast cancer-related lymphoedema is characterised by an abnormal accumulation of lymph in the interstitial spaces, leading to persistent swelling in the affected arm, shoulder, neck, breast, trunk, or any combination of these (Nelson, 2016). While this secondary lymphoedema can result from axillary node dissection, it may also occur from sentinel node biopsy or lumpectomy as a component of breast surgery, radiotherapy, or other trauma to the region (Liu et al, 2021). Its development is thought to be multifactorial and influenced by systemic treatment strategies, the individual’s ability to form collateral lymphatic pathways and body mass index (Runowicz et al, 2016; McLaughlin et al, 2020). Additionally, lymphoedema can also occur at any point in a woman’s life after breast cancer treatment, including mastectomy (Anderson and Armer, 2021). 

The treatment and self-management of lymphoedema have been found to create a significant physical, psychosocial and economic burden for breast cancer survivors (Fu et al, 2009; Cheville et al, 2020; Lovelace et al, 2019; Pritlove et al, 2019; Armer et al, 2020). Issues with physical immobility, pain, swelling, and compression bandaging interfere with work and leisure activities; such challenges result in a decreased quality of life (Flores et al, 2020; Lytvyn et al, 2020). 

Sun et al (2020) also reported on the negative economic impact of compromised work ability due to lymphoedema development. Women in this study reported the inability to work, the need to retire early, or having to adapt work duties due to the limitations caused by lymphoedema. Finally, De Vrieze et al (2020) documented the financial challenges people with lymphoedema face, such as the ongoing costs of treatment, therapy, and supplies across their lifetime. 

Aim

In describing breast cancer-related lymphoedema location and occurrence, the literature focuses on the upper extremity, with other locations such as the breast, chest, and trunk being less well-investigated. This is often due to difficulty in assessing and measuring lymphoedema in these areas (Mayrovitz and Weingrad, 2018). While BRRM does not typically require the removal of lymph nodes, local tissue, including lymphatic vessels, can experience trauma during breast removal (Figure 1). This potentially places a woman at risk of developing secondary lymphoedema following risk-reducing breast removal in her lifetime. 

With women making the decision to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy to decrease lifetime breast cancer risk, understanding the incidence of breast, chest and truncal lymphoedema occurring after this prophylactic surgery will serve to inform treatment approaches for this unique population of survivors. 

The purpose of this literature review is to understand the reported occurrence of lymphoedema of the breast, chest, and/or trunk following risk-reducing mastectomy in women with an elevated lifetime breast cancer risk. 

Methods
Search strategy

For this literature review, a BRRM was considered to be a risk-reducing surgery to remove both breasts, prior to a breast cancer diagnosis, in order to decrease an elevated lifetime breast cancer risk. A contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy was defined as a surgery to remove the unaffected breast after a breast cancer diagnosis. 

The following inclusion criteria for searches were selected: previous risk-reducing mastectomy, female assigned gender at birth, and the presence of reported breast, chest, and/or truncal lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy in the non-cancerous breast(s). 

Exclusion criteria for this review included: male assigned gender at birth, the diagnosis of lymphoedema in any part of the arm (peripheral lymphoedema) following risk-reducing mastectomy, a breast cancer diagnosis in the mastectomised breast, and prior lymphoedema occurrence in the contralateral breast, chest, and/or trunk. 

No studies were excluded based on participant age, study location, type of reconstruction after mastectomy, or if reconstruction occurred. 

The preliminary search: bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and breast, chest, truncal lymphoedema

A health sciences librarian (RG) and a research team member (KP) worked to organise initial search terms and search strategies with an initial focus on risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy and lymphoedema. 

The following databases were used: CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (DSR), MEDLINE, PapersFirst, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS). These databases were searched between July 2021 and October 2022 then, again in May 2023. No limit was placed on article age during these searches. For each database, search terms were generated after consulting known articles and subject terms surrounding lymphoedema following mastectomy (Armer et al, 2020; Cheville et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2021). The basic search terms set was: lymphedema OR lymphodema OR lymphoedema OR swelling OR edema OR oedema OR linfedema AND (Bilateral risk reducing mastectomy OR bilateral risk reduction mastectomy OR bilateral prophylactic mastectomy OR bilateral risk reducing breast surgery OR bilateral mastectomy OR ((breast surgery or mastectomy) and bilateral)).

A total of 353 records were screened for inclusion from this initial search, 301 from database searching and 52 from backward reference list searching. After the removal of duplicates, 253 records were screened for inclusion (Figure 2). Seventeen articles were assessed for eligibility, each being read through in its entirety. Unfortunately, no articles met the inclusion criteria. 

The revised search: contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy and breast, chest, truncal lymphoedema

To ensure a thorough search of the literature, and to gain an understanding of the incidence of lymphoedema occurring in a location other than the upper extremity following risk-reducing mastectomy in the setting of a prior breast cancer diagnosis in the contralateral breast, search terms were revised and broadened. The same seven databases were used as for the preliminary search. 

Again, a health sciences librarian (RG) and a research team member (KP) performed the databases searches, which occurred between September 2021 and October 2021 then again in May 2023. No limit was placed on article age during these searches. 

The revised basic search terms set created for our second literature search was as follows: lymphedema OR lymphodema OR lymphoedema OR swelling OR edema OR oedema OR linfedema AND (Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy OR contralateral risk reduction mastectomy OR contralateral prophylactic mastectomy OR contralateral risk reducing breast surgery OR contralateral mastectomy OR prophylactic mastectomy OR ((mastectomy/ or prophylactic mastectomy/) AND contralateral)). 

A total of 452 records were identified from the databases before removing duplicates, with an additional two articles identified from backward reference searching. A total of 234 records were screened for inclusion (Figure 3). Eleven articles were assessed for eligibility, with each being read in its entirety. 

Despite performing a second literature review in which search terms were revised, to broaden and capture articles in which breast, chest and/or truncal lymphoedema occurred following risk-reducing mastectomy in the setting of a previous breast cancer diagnosis, no articles were identified for inclusion in this review. 

Results

Despite an extensive review of the literature, including readjusting search terms in order to locate studies on breast, chest, and/or truncal lymphoedema occurrence following bilateral or contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy, no articles were identified for inclusion in this review. A paucity of studies addressed lymphoedema development in the breast, chest and/or trunk, even in women diagnosed with breast cancer. 

This may be due to the challenge of evaluating swelling in these areas, with Mayrovitz and Weingrad (2018) and Mazor et al (2019) both reporting difficulty in obtaining accurate measurements of truncal lymphoedema in women who had undergone treatment for breast cancer. Abouelazayem et al (2021) reported similar difficulties in addressing breast lymphoedema following breast cancer treatment due to the absence of standardised diagnostic criteria, a lack of consensus on non-extremity lymphoedema definition, and difficulty in diagnosing breast lymphoedema because of its symptoms being attributed to a treatment side-effect. 

Discussion

These sparse findings in the literature surrounding lymphoedema locations other than the upper extremity demonstrate that even in women who have undergone treatment for breast cancer, a gap in the literature exists to address and evaluate lymphoedema occurrence in sites other than the arm. Furthermore, this gap is starkly noticeable among women who have undergone risk-reducing mastectomy as we cannot definitively conclude that lymphoedema of the breast, chest, and/or trunk following risk-reducing mastectomy does not occur based on the dearth of literature. 

While this review of the literature did not yield results in identifying breast, chest and/or truncal lymphoedema following risk-reducing mastectomy, it emphasises the importance of addressing this gap. A future study could include a mixed-methods approach using quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews among women who have undergone either bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy or contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy after a breast cancer diagnosis. The experiences of swelling, pain, and/or a decrease in range of motion within the breast, chest, or truncal regions could also be investigated to better understand lymphoedema development in these areas of the body. 

Strengths and limitations

This literature review contained both strengths and limitations. As a strength, the discovery of a scant body of literature that met the search criteria was identified. This gap in lymphoedema occurrence in the breast, chest, and/or trunk following risk-reducing mastectomy has been recognised for further study. 

An additional strength of this review could be the benefit of raising awareness for the screening and surveillance of breast, chest and/or truncal lymphoedema in the clinical setting for women following risk-reducing mastectomy as more is learned about this phenomenon. The inclusion of an experienced research librarian as a member of the team also contributes to the strengths of the search strategy and the study findings. 

As a limitation, due to the uncertainty of genetic factors that may increase a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer, our search may be incomplete due to a lack of knowledge. Additionally, the decision to conduct a literature review in which we created our own method of searching with search term sets we selected has increased the risk of encountering bias as we reviewed the literature. 

As a final limitation, this review only searched studies published in English and the authors did not search the gray literature.

Conclusion

The literature search reveals an absence of studies evaluating the occurrence of breast, chest and/or truncal lymphoedema in women following risk-reducing mastectomy. Future studies are needed in order to understand if secondary lymphoedema is experienced from tissue trauma following prophylactic breast removal in women with an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer occurrence. Understanding secondary lymphoedema occurrence following risk-reducing mastectomy can serve to identify screening, support, and interventions to promote the mental and physical health across the lifetimes of these survivors. 

Disclaimer: Christa Torrisi received stipend support provided by NIH T32NR015426 awarded to the University of Missouri Sinclair School of Nursing and the Sinclair Fellowship through the Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri. Elizabeth Anderson received funding from the American Lymphedema Framework Project. Kajol Patel received the Ann Crowe Essig Undergraduate Nursing Research Mentorship from the University of Missouri-Columbia, Sinclair School of Nursing. The other authors declare that no funds, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript and have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. All authors contributed to the study conception, design, and analysis. Data collection was performed by Kajol Patel and Rebecca Graves. The first, and subsequent, drafts of the manuscript were written by Christa Torrisi and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References

lymphedema after conservative breast surgery: An up-to-date systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 21(3): 156–61 

Anbari AB, Wanchai A, Armer JM (2021) Breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life: A qualitative analysis over years of survivorship. Chronic Illn 17(3): 257–68

Anderson EA, Armer JM (2021) Factors impacting management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in Hispanic/Latina breast cancer survivors: A literature review. Hisp Health Care Int 19(3): 190–202

Armer JM, Ostby PL, Ginex PK et al (2020) ONS guidelines for cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Oncol Nurs Forum 47(5): 518–38

Bai L, Arver B, Johansson H et al (2019) Body image problems in women with and without breast cancer 6–20 years after bilateral risk-reducing surgery: A prospective follow-up. Breast 44: 120–7

Cheville A, Lee M, Moynihan T et al (2020) The impact of arm lymphedema on healthcare utilization during long-term breast cancer survivorship: A population-based cohort study. J Cancer Surviv 14(3): 347–55

Collins JM, Isaacs C (2020) Management of breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who are unaffected with cancer. Breast J 26(8): 1520–7

Dauenheimer M (2022) Lymphedema. Medical Illustration and Animation. Available from: https://www.medillsb.com/artist.aspx?AID=6677 (accessed 17.08.23)

De Vrieze T, Nevelsteen I, Thomis S et al (2020) What are the economic burden and costs associated with the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 28(2): 439–49

Drohan B, Roche CA, Cusack JC et al (2012) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and other hereditary syndromes: Using technology to identify carriers. Ann Surg Oncol 19(6): 1732–7

Flores AM, Nelson J, Sowles L et al (2020) Lymphedema signs, symptoms, and diagnosis in women who are in minority and low-income groups and have survived breast cancer. Phys Ther 100(3): 487–99

Free for all healthcare professionals

Sign up to the Wounds Group journals





By clicking ‘Subscribe’, you are agreeing that the Wounds Group are able to email you periodic newsletters. You may unsubscribe from these at any time. Your info is safe with us and we will never sell or trade your details. For information please review our privacy policy.

Are you a healthcare professional? This website is for healthcare professionals only. To continue, please confirm that you are a healthcare professional below.

We use cookies responsibly to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your browser settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website. Read about how we use cookies.

I am not a healthcare professional.